Compare top-rated CFD brokers and find the best match for your trading style. Enjoy strong investor protection, tight spreads, and highly regulated broker services.
Broker features, fees and regulation compared.
82% of retail CFD accounts lose money
74% of retail CFD accounts lose money
57% of retail CFD accounts lose money
74-89% of retail CFD accounts lose money
73.46% of retail CFD accounts lose money
51% of retail CFD accounts lose money
76.15% of retail CFD accounts lose money
| Broker | Rating | Trading Fees | Min Deposit | Regulation | Platforms | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plus500
CFD Specialist
|
4.7 / 5 (★★★★★) | Zero Commission (additional fees may apply) | $100 | FCA, ASIC, CySEC (#250/14) | Proprietary Web, Mobile App | Open Account → |
|
82% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
|
XTB
Top Web Platform
|
4.7 / 5 (★★★★★) | Low Spreads / Zero Commission | $0 | FCA, CySEC, KNF | xStation 5, xStation Mobile | Open Account → |
|
74% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
AvaTrade
Multi-Regulated
|
4.6 / 5 (★★★★☆) | Zero Commission (Fixed Spreads) | $100 | CBI, ASIC, FSCA | MT4, MT5, AvaTradeGO | Open Account → |
|
57% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
Exness
High Leverage Pick
|
4.5 / 5 (★★★★☆) | Zero / Up to $3.50/side | $10 | FCA, CySEC, FSA | MT4, MT5, Exness Trade App | Open Account → |
|
74-89% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
IC Markets
Raw Spread Pick
|
4.8 / 5 (★★★★★) | $3.50/side Raw | $0 Standard | $200 | ASIC, CySEC, SCB | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Open Account → |
|
73.46% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
|
eToro
Social Trading
|
4.5 / 5 (★★★★☆) | Spread-based & Crypto fees | $50 | FCA, CySEC, ASIC | eToro Web, Mobile App | Open Account → |
|
51% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
XM
Low Entry
|
4.5 / 5 (★★★★☆) | Low (from 0.6 pips) | $5 | CySEC, ASIC, DFSA | MT4, MT5, XM App | Open Account → |
|
76.15% of retail CFD accounts lose money
|
||||||
When looking at the biggest CFD brokers in the world, it is easy to assume that the largest company must also offer the best trading conditions. In reality, broker size tells only part of the story. Some providers stand out for their international reach, others for their client base, trading activity or range of platforms.
There is no single universal ranking of the largest CFD brokers in the world. Companies report different measures of size, and not every broker publishes comparable figures. That is why it is useful to consider both a broker's market presence and the services it actually provides.
TradeRankCompare covers seven internationally recognised brokers: Plus500, XTB, AvaTrade, Exness, IC Markets, eToro and XM. Each has a different approach to trading platforms, pricing and account features. Our editorial ranking focuses on these differences rather than company size alone.
Plus500 focuses on CFD trading through its own platform, with access to a range of underlying markets. Its streamlined interface makes it a useful starting point when comparing dedicated CFD platforms.
Read Full Review → OUR RANK #2XTB combines CFD trading with its proprietary xStation platform, which includes charting, research and market analysis tools. In certain markets, it also offers non-CFD investment products.
Read Full Review → OUR RANK #3AvaTrade offers CFDs across several asset classes, with a choice of proprietary and third-party trading platforms. Its range of platform options is one of the main features worth comparing.
Read Full Review → OUR RANK #4Exness focuses on forex and CFD trading, with multiple account structures and pricing arrangements. Traders comparing Exness should examine the combined cost of spreads, commissions and financing.
Read Full Review → OUR RANK #5IC Markets is known for its forex and CFD offering, including raw-spread account options and established trading platforms. Its pricing structure is particularly relevant when comparing spreads and commissions.
Read Full Review → OUR RANK #6eToro combines social investing features with access to multiple financial products. Depending on the instrument and jurisdiction, these may include CFDs and non-CFD investments. Product type and fees should be checked carefully.
Read Full Review → OUR RANK #7XM offers forex and CFD trading through MetaTrader platforms, alongside educational resources and different account options. Its trading conditions depend on the account type and regulatory entity.
Read Full Review →A broker can be considered large for several reasons. Before comparing company size, it helps to understand which figures are being used and whether they measure the same thing.
The number of active clients can indicate the scale of a broker's operations. Registered accounts and active customers, however, are not the same measure.
Revenue, profitability and published financial statements can provide insight into a broker's business size and financial position.
International reach can be assessed through the markets served and the broker's operating entities, while accounting for regional restrictions.
Not necessarily. A broker with a large international presence may still have higher trading costs or fewer relevant platform features than another provider. The best comparison depends on what you need from a trading account.
In our current CFD comparison, Plus500 ranks first for its focused CFD platform, followed by XTB for its platform and research tools and AvaTrade for its platform variety. These are TradeRankCompare's editorial rankings, not a ranking of the world's largest brokers by revenue, trading volume or customer numbers.
For a more complete comparison, look at total trading costs, available instruments, execution policies, overnight financing charges and the regulatory entity responsible for your account. A large broker is not automatically the most suitable one.
We rank CFD brokers by evaluating platform quality, trading costs, account flexibility and regulatory conditions. Our ranking prioritizes the overall trading experience rather than simply the lowest advertised spreads.
Plus500 ranks #1 for its focused CFD platform, followed by XTB (#2) for xStation's research tools and AvaTrade (#3) for its platform variety.
Exness (#4) offers flexible account structures, while IC Markets (#5) emphasizes raw-spread pricing. We consider total costs, not just minimum spreads.
eToro (#6) stands out for copy trading, while XM (#7) offers MetaTrader and educational resources. We also consider regulatory protections and regional restrictions across all brokers.
Our research: We compare published broker fees, platform features, account terms and regulatory information. Rankings reflect editorial judgment and are separate from individual broker scores.
Compare CFD broker platforms, pricing structures, account conditions and key trading features.
Brokers are listed in TradeRankCompare's editorial ranking order, matching our CFD comparison table. Scores are separate editorial indicators. Trading conditions and protections vary by jurisdiction.
CFD-focused broker offering proprietary web and mobile trading platforms across multiple markets.
Plus500 focuses on CFD trading through its own web and mobile platforms. Its interface provides access to instruments including forex, indices, commodities and share CFDs, depending on the client's region. Trading costs are generally incorporated into spreads, although overnight funding and other charges may apply.
82% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Publicly listed broker offering CFD market access through its proprietary xStation platform.
XTB combines CFD market access with its proprietary xStation platform, featuring charting tools, market information and educational resources. As a publicly listed company, XTB publishes corporate disclosures. Product availability, fees and regulatory protections vary according to the client's jurisdiction.
74% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Multi-platform CFD broker offering MetaTrader, proprietary trading applications and selected risk-management features.
AvaTrade supports MetaTrader and its own trading applications. AvaProtect, where available, provides defined protection on eligible trades during a selected period in exchange for a fee. The feature has instrument, regional and product restrictions.
Source: AvaProtect product information
57% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Multi-asset CFD broker offering Standard and professional account structures with different pricing arrangements.
Exness offers several CFD account types with different trading-cost structures. Standard accounts generally use spread-based pricing, while Raw Spread and Zero accounts may involve commissions. Leverage, account availability and regulatory protections depend on the relevant legal entity.
CFDs are complex leveraged instruments and carry a high risk of losing money
CFD broker offering raw-spread accounts, commission-based pricing and multiple trading platforms.
IC Markets provides raw-spread and Standard account options. Raw spreads can start from 0.0 pips, but this is a minimum advertised spread rather than a guaranteed average. Total trading costs also depend on commissions, market conditions and any overnight financing charges.
73.46% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Multi-asset platform combining CFD trading, investing and social trading functionality.
eToro offers CopyTrader functionality, allowing eligible users to replicate selected investors' positions. Its platform provides access to multiple asset classes, although not every product is a CFD. Copy trading involves market risk, and availability and fees vary by country.
51% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Multi-asset CFD broker offering MetaTrader platforms, account options and educational resources.
XM offers MetaTrader-based CFD trading, several account configurations and educational materials. Some eligible accounts have low minimum deposits, while spreads, commissions, leverage and available instruments depend on the account type and legal entity.
76.15% of retail CFD accounts lose money
Our CFD broker ranking is not simply a list of platforms with the tightest advertised spreads. At TradeRankCompare, we consider how each broker's platform, trading costs, market coverage, account conditions and regulatory framework fit together. That is why our ranking places Plus500 first, XTB second and AvaTrade third, followed by Exness, IC Markets, eToro and XM.
Each broker has a different strength. Plus500 focuses on a streamlined CFD trading experience, XTB combines CFD market access with xStation's research tools, and AvaTrade offers broader platform choice and selected risk-management features. Exness and IC Markets provide alternative pricing structures, while eToro emphasizes social trading and XM offers accessible account options. Our ranking reflects these differences rather than treating every broker as interchangeable.
Plus500 takes our #1 position because its proprietary platform is built around CFD trading, with a straightforward interface and access to several CFD asset classes. XTB ranks #2 because xStation combines trading functionality with integrated charts, market information and research. AvaTrade ranks #3 partly because it supports MetaTrader alongside its own platforms. We consider the usability and features of each platform, not simply the number of platforms advertised.
IC Markets ranks #5 despite offering raw-spread accounts with spreads advertised from 0.0 pips on selected instruments. Exness ranks #4 with several account structures, including Standard, Raw Spread and Zero. These options can be relevant when comparing trading costs, but minimum spreads alone do not represent total expenses. Our comparison also considers commissions, overnight financing, platform suitability and the transparency of account conditions.
We consider the legal entity behind each broker rather than relying only on a familiar brand name. Plus500, XTB, AvaTrade, Exness, IC Markets, eToro and XM operate through different regulatory structures. Client fund segregation, negative balance protection, compensation arrangements and leverage restrictions can differ by country and account classification. A broker's regulatory status in one country does not automatically establish identical protections elsewhere.
Our ranking evaluates more than the lowest available spread. We place Plus500 first because we give weight to its focused CFD trading interface and straightforward proprietary platform. IC Markets ranks fifth but offers a different proposition: raw-spread account options and platforms such as MetaTrader and cTrader. Traders comparing transaction costs should consider commissions, average spreads and overnight charges rather than the advertised minimum spread alone.
XTB takes second place in our editorial ranking because of its xStation platform, integrated market analysis and multi-asset CFD offering. AvaTrade ranks third and provides a different advantage: greater platform variety, including MetaTrader, and access to AvaProtect on eligible trades in supported jurisdictions. The distinction reflects our preference for XTB's integrated platform experience in this overall comparison, not a claim that XTB is superior for every trading requirement.
We place Exness fourth because its Standard, Raw Spread, Zero and Pro account structures offer several ways to compare pricing and trading conditions. IC Markets follows in fifth place, with a strong emphasis on raw-spread pricing and third-party trading platforms. These positions reflect our overall editorial comparison, not verified evidence that one broker consistently provides better live execution or lower costs across every instrument.
eToro ranks sixth because its social and copy trading features distinguish it from more conventional CFD-focused platforms. However, its proprietary platform may not suit users seeking MetaTrader or raw-spread account structures. XM ranks seventh, offering MetaTrader platforms, educational resources and low minimum deposits on eligible accounts. Both remain included because their features address different requirements, even though they rank below our top five overall.
No. Our displayed CFD broker order is an overall editorial ranking, while individual broker scores are separate indicators. The scores do not mechanically determine the positions in the comparison table. We consider platform functionality, costs, market access, account conditions and relevant regulatory information when explaining our choices.
A ranking is only useful when readers can understand what supports it. Our research approach focuses on broker-published account terms, official regulatory information and the differences between trading conditions across legal entities. We distinguish documented features from marketing claims and avoid treating minimum advertised costs as guaranteed trading conditions.
For brokers such as Plus500, XTB and AvaTrade, we distinguish the brand from the company legally providing the trading account. The relevant regulatory authority and authorization details should be checked against official registers. This matters because a broker may serve customers in different countries through separate entities with different protections.
Exness and IC Markets illustrate why pricing comparisons require more than a headline spread. We examine available account descriptions, commission schedules and financing information. A raw-spread account may charge a separate commission, while a Standard account may incorporate more of the trading cost into the spread. Actual costs depend on the instrument, account and market conditions.
We examine official platform and product information when comparing features. Examples include Plus500's proprietary platform, XTB's xStation, AvaTrade's AvaProtect, eToro's CopyTrader and XM's MetaTrader offering. We also consider regional restrictions and eligibility conditions, because a feature advertised by a broker may not be available to every customer.
Identify the legal company named in the broker's terms and conditions, then look for that entity in the relevant regulator's official public register. Check its authorization status and whether the regulated activities cover the services offered. Do not rely solely on a regulator's logo displayed on the broker's website.
No. Regulation may impose requirements concerning client money, disclosures and conduct, but protections differ by legal entity and jurisdiction. Fund segregation does not eliminate every risk, and compensation schemes may have eligibility restrictions and financial limits. CFD positions themselves can also lose value regardless of the broker's regulatory status.
Our published comparison draws on available broker documentation and editorial research. We do not present every broker's live execution speed, average slippage or actual trading spreads as independently tested measurements. Where a figure comes from a broker's own disclosures, it should be understood as broker-reported information.
Yes. Material changes to pricing, supported platforms, product availability, account conditions or regulatory status can affect an editorial assessment. Readers should confirm current terms directly with the relevant broker before relying on a comparison.